In DRUMS, neutrinos are excitations of the coherent superfluid medium coupled to the cubic magnetic substrate:
Each \(\psi_i\) corresponds to a flavor state \(\nu_e, \nu_\mu, \nu_\tau\).
Flavor changes arise from differential phase evolution:
Where \(\phi_i\) are phase potentials from local superfluid density and \(\kappa_{ij}\) are coupling terms induced by cubic substrate interactions.
The probability for a neutrino to change flavor over distance \(L\) is:
Here \(\Delta \phi = \phi_2 - \phi_1\) represents phase difference between eigenstates; \(\theta\) is effective mixing angle from substrate-mediated couplings.
Superfluid density variations in stellar interiors or Earth modify \(\phi_i\), producing MSW-like resonance:
Where \(V_i\) is the effective potential from local superfluid density \(\rho_{sf}\).
Phase accumulation depends on neutrino energy \(E\):
Where \(\Delta m_{eff}^2\) emerges from superfluid-mediated interactions, reproducing observed energy-dependent oscillation patterns.
Superfluid coherence length sets the maximum distance for flavor oscillations:
Beyond \(L_{coh}\), oscillations average out, consistent with observed long-baseline neutrino behavior.
Within the DRUMS framework, neutrino flavor changes are fully explained as:
No ad hoc neutrino mass assumptions are required; the flavor change is a direct consequence of superfluid dynamics and substrate interactions.